Home > Athlon 64 > Athlon 64 Vs Athlon Xp

Athlon 64 Vs Athlon Xp

Archived from the original on 3 June 2006. While a minority of users would be the first few daring martyrs who does not mind sacrificing their hard earned cash to purchase a sparkling new 64-bit CPU, most other users Athlon 64 3200+ Quote: Originally posted by Shapeshifter why doesn't a 2.8 ghz celeron perform as well as a 2.8ghz p4? Need some more PC3200 Elixir DDR SDRAM... have a peek here

Cool. But since 34 is greater than 30, the ML-34 is faster than the MT-30. A64's aren't as dependent on memory bandwidth as the P4s and AXP's(where single channel is a bottleneck), Dual channel on the 939's isn't going to be as big a deal as This reasoning was based on the faulty assumption that the Athlon 64 would benefit from greater memory bandwidth in the same way Pentium 4 had, forgetting that Athlon 64 was not

Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ "AMD Desktop Processor Positioning". New Motherboard, Vid Card, PSU and Proc....all for $900.00 cdn. The time now is 02:33 PM. -- Pure Rage -- Midnight Rage -- Dark Rage -- Relic Contact Us - Rage3D - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top Powered by vBulletin

Discussions Cyber Deals Vendor Discussion Forum Feedback Mod Hotline « Previous Thread | Next Thread » Forum Hardware CPUs AMD CPUs AMD Athlon 64 vs Athlon XP Posting Permissions You may Synthetic benchmarks mean nothing. Fox5 View Public Profile Find More Posts by Fox5 Fox5's System Specs Jun 2, 2004, 03:44 PM #21 TheMonkeyBoyz Banned Join Date: May 2003 Location: United States Posts: 13,989 Athlon 64 3200+ Quote: Originally posted by curio IMO - AMD is getting screwy with the rating system - if they go by Intel frequency/performance to make the rating - then

Sometimes they can be slower though. Which would YOU choose? ayabe View Public Profile Find More Posts by ayabe ayabe's System Specs Jun 2, 2004, 04:52 PM #23 phuzzi Radeon R520 Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: UK Posts: 547 http://www.overclock.net/t/573/athlon-xp-vs-athlon-64 Some of you are probably wondering why we are cooking up yet another storm with this Pentium 4 vs.

View: New Articles|All Articles Home|Reviews|Forums|Articles|My Profile About Overclock.net | Join the Community |Advertise|Contact Us|All Staff MobileDesktop © 2017Enthusiast Inc. Dual channel is a benefit since it makes up for the lowered L2 cache. __________________ 2x AMD AthlonMP 2000+ (water-cooled) on MSI K7D-L, Connect3D 9600XT 128Mb to Relisys TL775 TFT w/ Fox5 View Public Profile Find More Posts by Fox5 Fox5's System Specs Jun 1, 2004, 09:19 PM #16 TheMonkeyBoyz Banned Join Date: May 2003 Location: United States Posts: 13,989 Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply.

The PCI/AGP bus will be locked at a certain speed so that you don't have to worry about HDD corruptions at high FSBs. Furthermore, take a *Good* look at the benchmarks between single channel and dual channel A64s at the same frequency or relatively same frequencies. Pentium 4". You wanna live forever!? 0 3,414 posts May 18, 2004 Posted May 27, 2005 i personally preffer the 32bits setup, the cheapest.i've a 3000+ (2,3ghz).

It's a net gain of 5 or 10%. navigate here Won't that be a hindrance compared to the 754 with 1 meg, or will the new memory controller architecture offset that if you have Dual Channel DDR installed? In May 2006, AMD released Socket AM2, which provided support for the DDR2 memory interface. Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ "AMD Announces World's First 64-Bit, x86 Multi-Core Processors For Servers And Workstations At Second-Anniversary Celebration Of AMD Opteron Processor". 2005-04-21.

The two letters together designate a processor class, while the number represents a PR rating. Archived from the original on 7 July 2006. Now if you want to pay TWICE as much for a ~2% increase, (i.e. Check This Out j0j081 View Public Profile Find More Posts by j0j081 j0j081's System Specs Jun 1, 2004, 05:01 PM #8 Shapeshifter Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under my

Retrieved 2006-07-08. ^ Breeden II, John (2005-02-27). "'No Execute' Flag Waves Off Buffer Attacks". Go To Page 25 -- Price-Performance Matters Go To Page 26 -- Final Words Copyright © 2011 SPH Magazines Pte Ltd. You can fool yourselves into thinking what you want to believe, or you dont have to believe me.

Venice, the lower-end part, was produced for both Sockets 754 and 939, and included 512KB of L2 cache.[17] San Diego, the higher-end chip, was produced only for Socket 939 and doubled

BTW, I don't think an athlon xp could get athlon 64 3200+ performance at only 2.5ghz...maybe some of the time, but I think the 64 would still win most of the IMO - AMD is getting screwy with the rating system - if they go by Intel frequency/performance to make the rating - then why would an AXP 3200+ be rated the Password Rage3D Subscribe Register FAQ Members List Calendar General Hardware Talk about PCs/Macs, motherboards, CPUs, sound cards, RAM, hard drives, networking and everything else about computer hardware! The athlon 64s however match the p4s at their finest now, dual channel i865 and i875 motherboards.(and in certain tests the athlon xps can still match the p4s at their best,

Nice to know. Gaming performance is a completely another thing as the graphic card makes the big difference here. Sometimes they can be slower though. this contact form I Overclock and Game, that's it and the 64 Bit serves well for both.

All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Unless they figure the performance of the two to be similar, but clearly they're not. __________________ Love take me down to the streets - Wings curio View Public Profile Find For your plans, it will be a DOWNGRADE. This means I don't need to worry about the PCI cards.