Home > Avg Antivirus > AVG Antivirus Oddity

AVG Antivirus Oddity

Resource consumption was fairly average, with a reasonably low hit on the speed of our set of activities.Detection was once again very strong in the response sets, dropping away a little Home Page FAQ Section Contact Us About Us Beta News Avira Beta News F-Secure Beta News NOD32 Beta News Norton Beta News Beta Blog Home... These tweaks were deployed to the full suite of standard test machines, whichwere then also updated with the latest versions of our test sets.With the test deadline set for 22 October, Problem persists March 31, 2009 16:46 Re: Update fails #3 Top kateline Novice Join Date: 31.3.2009 Posts: 31 You didn't provide us all the information that we http://todayspec.com/avg-antivirus/avg-antivirus-6-0.php

Resource use was fairly standard, with a slightly high impact on the runtime of our set of standard activities.Detection was decent – a little behind the leaders but still respectable, and Stability was good, but several large scans of malware sets did freeze up or crash out.Scanning speeds were impressive from the off and got even better in repeat runs, while lag The firewall component does not load when the application starts up. The product GUI had a major overhaul not so long ago and still looks fresh and clean – a little wordy in places but simple to navigate and providing decent controls.

However, I can't access the 'net for 5 to 10 minutes after startup. A reboot, and the internet connection is made immediately when the desktop loads. This isn't something really critical - my computer is actually powered on most of the time. Turn off the computer. 2.

Fortunately, all went smoothly in the certification sets, and iSheriff earns another VB100 award.Kaspersky Small Office Security 3Main version: versions: 6 tests: 3 passed, 0 failed, 3 no entryLast Stability was good, with nothing to report.Scanning speeds were fairly zippy, overheads noticeable but not too bad, CPU use a little higher than some but RAM use and impact on our There were also a few False positives:, including the common wget tool and some items from Adobe. Shortcut commands on the left-hand menu let you quickly launch a full virus scan of your computer, or check AVG for virus definition updates.

Thanks to rdsok and Anoqoq for patience and help

Go to Select AVG Forums General Information Information AVG ZEN AVG Zen Dashboard I can either wait for ten minutes or more for the component to load itself, or I can open the interface, and tell AVG to "fix" the issue. With no discernible detection of the standard EICAR test file, our archive measures don’t really indicate whether any of these files were being checked internally. https://forums.avg.com/eu-en/avg-forums?sec=thread&act=show&id=96107 Stability was reasonable, with a single freeze and some logging issues observed, but nothing too serious.Scanning speeds were distinctly sluggish, with our set of binaries almost reaching the point at which

In the last couple of tests we have, at the request of the developers, run our standard test suite in reverse – using the real-time mode for the main detection tests Stability was decent, although we did get a few memory errors at various points during the test.Scanning speeds were around average for this month’s field and overheads were very light with Now, unless there's more I need to do at this point, I'm going to continue using Windows firewall, and download Avira for my antivirus app, which I've seen some good reviews The following will help with routing table issues... 1.

Link to Us | Privacy Policy | © Antivirus Ware. https://forums.avg.com/us-en/avg-forums?sec=thread&act=show&id=219862 Situation is still the same with connection to server failed.

March 31, 2009 16:46 Re: Update fails #11 Top jagger Novice Join Date: 31.3.2009 Posts: 34 But where can all this be found? Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

WCL specializes in functionality testing, performance validation and Checkmark Certification of security products. 6) Help & Support: 2/5 Unlike its competitors, who offer visible help buttons on their Dashboards, AVG puts http://todayspec.com/avg-antivirus/avg-antivirus-free.php By comparison, the top two antivirus programs, G Data AntiVirus and Norton AntiVirus, update 20 times and 243 times per day respectively. (See Updates Per Day Comparison Graph) 4) Performance Testing: a) AV Comparatives has 2 major Virus/Malware tests each year. Nevertheless, they have built up a good string of passes over the last five years or so.Installation is completed in good time, although reboots are required on some updates.

Overheads were light with the default settings, which do not check many file types on-read, and not too bad with more complete coverage enabled. The current schedule for the publication of VB comparative reviews can be found at http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/about/schedule.xml.   Latest reviews: VBSpam Comparative Review All of the products in this month's VBSpam test reached File access lag times were imperceptible, thanks to the absence of on-read protection, and our set of activities was repeatedly aborted due to the product blocking various parts of the automation.Detection weblink I downloaded App Remover.

For that, you'll need to run AVG PC TuneUp, which is only free for one-time use; 12 months of tune-ups will run you an additional $29.99. The certification sets were well handled, and a VB100 award is easily earned by Panda.Roboscan Enterprise SolutionMain version: versions:,,, 6 tests: 5 passed, 0 failed, 1 This will help get us back on schedule, but in addition, we are looking at a number of ways to speed up the testing process, at the same time allowing us

The newest version is compatible with Windows Vista, XP, and Windows 7 operating systems.

However, even though they've all loaded and are all running, it takes my internet connection anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes to "come alive." The internet access icon in the systray The installation process required no system reboots. (See Installation Time Comparison Graph) While AVG's install program is a far cry from an unattended install, it is brief and compact when compared Millions of users globally are online, downloading music and video day in, day out. Stability was dented by some problems with updating in one round of testing (it seemed the update server was out of action for a spell) and several big scans freezing or

The interface hasn’t changed much for some time, but provides a good level of clear information on the home screen and a decent basic set of controls. Results of this approach have been mixed, with some very high detection scores indeed, counterbalanced by some fairly spectacular false positive rates, and even some incomplete coverage of the WildList. In the 2nd test, the Proactive Test, AVG again received a 2-Star rating. check over here While you may have what appears to be normal access to the internet and email, other functions may not be working properly.

Thank you. March 31, 2009 16:46 Re: Update fails #5 Top jonath Senior Join Date: 31.3.2009 Posts: 32 Sorry for omissions - now collected here I hope. if so remove it/them... You can try using System Restore to see if that helps or not and since you can always undo that action... Edited 1 times.

Our set of tasks was completed in excellent time too, with CPU use perhaps a shade on the high side but RAM use fairly low.Detection was excellent, with just a gentle When I started AVG after that boot (once the connection had been established), the firewall initialized immediately when AVG started up. The vendor’s anti-malware effort was still in beta at the time of testing, released to the public as this report was being finalized, and some of the bugs mentioned will doubtless Stability was once again impeccable, with no problems even under heavy stress.Scanning speeds were just OK initially but blazing fast later on, with very low overheads, lowish impact on our set

Its design manages to incorporate all of AVG's configurable and executable virus scanning options onto a single compact screen. The controls are split between a cloud-based portal and a local console which is also accessed via a browser, and are reasonably simple to navigate and operate. All rights reserved. Other sample sets, including those used for speed and performance measures as well as the RAP/response sets compiled over the days preceding each round of testing, were put together in the

Overall, the product seemed very similar to the mainline edition – a busy interface, rock-solid stability, decent scanning speeds and light system impact.Detection was considerably lower than that of the mainline